Ayesha N. Khan is a seasoned trial and appellate litigator. She has served as counsel in thirty-five U.S. Supreme Court cases, more than one hundred federal appellate proceedings, scores of federal district court cases, and dozens of state court matters.

Prior to coming to Potomac Law, Ms. Khan was a Deputy Chief with the Appellate Section of the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice, where she represented the United States in cases involving the application of Title VII, Title IX, and other civil rights statute in a variety of contexts, including education, employment, and public accommodations. She also represented the United States in criminal cases involving, among other things, human trafficking, civil rights conspiracies, habeas corpus protections, and the federal sentencing guidelines.

Before joining DOJ, Ms. Khan was the Legal Director of a national advocacy organization, overseeing a team of attorneys in a nationwide trial and appellate litigation practice involving complex substantive and procedural questions involving the First Amendment, class-action practice, civil rights statutes, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Ms. Khan’s extensive litigation background has equipped her to represent a wide array of clients in private practice. Her cases have involved regulatory questions, products liability and other areas of tort law, contractual disputes, civil rights issues, defamation and other issues touching on the First Amendment, appellate family law questions, and a host of other issues. She prides herself on approaching each engagement with a fresh and creative eye, providing clients with a frank assessment of the merits of disputes, and scaling each representation to fit a client’s needs.

Representative Experience

U.S. Supreme Court (as counsel to a party on the merits or in certiorari- stage briefing)

  • Univ. of Notre Dame v. Burwell (2016), a challenge to Affordable Care Act regulations regarding the provision of contraceptive insurance to employees of nonprofit organizations

  • Town of Greece v. S.G. (2014), a challenge to the delivery of sectarian prayers at town-council meetings

  • Elmbrook Sch. Dist. v. Does (2014), a challenge to holding a public-school graduation ceremony in a church

  • F.J. v. Forsyth Cnty. (2012), a challenge to the delivery of sectarian prayers at county-council meetings

  • A.P. v. Ky. Baptist Homes for Children (2011), a challenge to the provision of public funds to a religious institution

  • Borden v. Sch. Dist. (2009), a free-speech challenge to a school district’s policy banning a football coach from leading his team in prayer

  • K.S. v. Harris Cnty. (2007), a challenge to a courthouse Bible display

  • S.G. v. Moore, 540 U.S. 1000 (2003), a challenge to a Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Judicial Building

  • Zelman v. D.S. (2002), a case upholding the provision of educational vouchers to parochial schools U.S. Supreme Court (as counsel to an amicus curiae)

  • Ivy v. Morath (2016), an Americans with Disabilities Act challenge regarding deaf individuals’ access to private drivers’ education programs

  • Heffernan v. City of Paterson (2016), which held that the Free Speech Clause bars the demotion of an employee based on an erroneous perception of the employee’s support of a political candidate

  • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), an Equal Protection and Due Process challenge to a law forbidding same-sex couples to marry

  • Walker v. Tex. Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. (2015), a First Amendment challenge to a regulation prohibiting “offensive” specialty license plates

  • Holt v. Hobbs (2015), a prisoner’s challenge to a prohibition on facial hair

  • Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores (2014), a challenge to Affordable Care Act regulations requiring the provision of contraceptive insurance to employees of religious for-profit corporations

  • Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n (2012), a case involving the scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act

  • Christian Legal Soc’y v. Martinez (2010), a challenge to the exclusion of discriminatory clubs from a university’s student-club funding program

  • Pleasant Grove v. Summum (2009), a free-speech challenge to the denial of a group’s request to erect a monument in a public park

  • Hein v. Freedom from Religion Found. (2007), which held that taxpayers lacked standing to challenge disbursements by the federal executive branch

  • Sole v. Wyner (2007), which held that attorneys’ fees are unavailable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 when a preliminary injunction is subsequently lifted

  • McCreary Cnty. v. ACLU and Van Orden v. Perry (2005), challenges to Ten Commandments displays in county courthouses and on a state capitol’s grounds

  • Cutter v. Wilkinson (2005), regarding the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act

  • Locke v. Davey (2004), a challenge to the denial of public funding for theology instruction

  • Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch. (2001), a free-speech challenge to a prohibition against religious meetings in elementary school

  • Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe (2000), a challenge to the delivery of prayer at high-school football games

  • Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Wis. Sys. v. Southworth (2000), a free-speech challenge to the use of student activity fees to support political organizations espousing views with which contributors disagree

Federal Appellate Courts: Counsel to a party

  • Nat’l Postal Policy Council v. Postal Regulatory Comm’n (D.C. Cir. 2018), regarding agency’s discretion to undertake revisions to postal rates

  • Wilson v. United States (8th Cir. 2016), regarding a defendant’s entitlement to file successive habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 after being convicted and sentenced for criminal civil rights violations

  • United States v. Rushin (11th Cir. 2016), an appeal from the conviction of correctional officers under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 & 242 for inmate beatings

  • Univ. of Notre Dame v. Sebelius (7th Cir. 2014), a challenge to Affordable Care Act regulations regarding the provision of contraceptive insurance to students

  • Challenges to the delivery of sectarian prayers at deliberative-body meetings, including S.G. v. Town of Greece (2d Cir. 2012), F.J. v. Forsyth Cnty., 653 F.3d 341 (4th Cir. 2011), and G.P. v. Cobb Cnty. (11th Cir. 2008)

  • Does v. Elmbrook Sch. Dist. (7th Cir. 2011-2012), a challenge to a public school’s practice of holding graduation ceremonies in a church

  • R.W. v. City of S. Bend (7th Cir. 2012), which involved the transfer of public land to a religious school

  • Challenges to students’ delivery of prayers in various public-school settings, including over a school’s intercom system and at graduation ceremonies, in C.S. v. Medina Valley Indep. Sch. Dist. (5th Cir. 2011), and Does v. Sch. Bd. of Ouachita Parish (5th Cir. 2001)

  • K.W. v. Wagner (9th Cir. 2011), a challenge to the delivery of prayers at community-college graduations, scholarship ceremonies, and other higher- education events

  • A.P. v. Ky. Baptist Homes for Children (6th Cir. 2009), a Title VII and Establishment Clause challenge to the termination of an employee by a publicly funded social-service provider

  • Challenges to Ten Commandments displays on government property, including J.C. v. City of Everett (9th Cir. 2008), K.S. v. Harris Cnty. (5th Cir. 2007), A.M. v. Allegheny Cnty. (3d Cir. 2004), and S.G. v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003)

  • Borden v. Sch. Dist. (3d Cir. 2008), a free-speech challenge to a school policy banning coach-led team prayers

  • Ams. United for Separation of Church & State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries (8th Cir. 2007), a challenge to a pervasively sectarian prison program

  • C.S. v. Chesterfield County Bd. of Sup’rs (4th Cir. 2005), a First Amendment challenge to the exclusion of minority clergy from the list of persons eligible to offer prayers before official meetings

Federal Appellate Courts: Counsel to an amici curiae

  • Watkins v. Sec’y Fla. DOC (11th Cir. 2016), a prisoner’s Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act challenge to the denial of kosher meals

  • Hassan v. City of New York (3d Cir. 2015), a challenge to governmental surveillance of Muslim organizations

  • Several challenges to governmental funding programs, including Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley (8th Cir. 2015), Sherman v. Illinois (7th Cir. 2012), Detroit Dev. Auth. v. Am. Atheists (6th Cir. 2009), Colo. Christian Univ. v. Weaver (10th Cir. 2008), and Eulitt v. Me. Dep’t of Educ. (1st Cir. 2004)

  • Over a dozen challenges to governmental displays, including Trunk v. City of San Diego (9th Cir. 2015), ACLU v. Dixie Cnty. (11th Cir. 2012), ACLU of Ohio Found. v. DeWeese (6th Cir. 2011), Green v. Haskell County Bd. of Comm’rs (10th Cir. 2009), and Cooper v. U.S. Postal Serv. (2d Cir. 2009)

  • Stormans v. Wiesman and Stormans v. Selecky (9th Cir. 2009 & 2015), a Free Exercise, Equal Protection, and Due Process Clause challenge to a regulation requiring pharmacies to dispense contraception

  • King v. Governor of N.J. (3d Cir. 2014), a free-speech, free-exercise, and substantive-due-process challenge to a prohibition on “sexual orientation change therapy” for minors

  • Freedom from Religion Found. v. City of Warren (6th Cir. 2013), a free-speech challenge to a city’s denial of an atheist organization’s request to erect a holiday display at a civic center

  • Over two dozen challenges to Affordable Care Act regulations regarding the provision of contraceptive-coverage to employees of religious for-profit corporations and nonprofit organizations (2013-2015)

  • Several challenges to the delivery of sectarian prayers at school-board, county-council, and other government meetings, including Atheists of Fla. v. City of Lakeland (11th Cir. 2013), Doe v. Indian River Sch. Dist., 653 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2011), Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd. (5th Cir. 2007), andWynne v. Town of Great Falls (4th Cir. 2004)

  • Ward v. Polite (6th Cir. 2012), a challenge to a public college’s termination of a student who refused to counsel LGBT students in a required practicum

  • Several Title VII challenges to the treatment of employees (or potential employees), including Spencer v. World Vision (9th Cir. 2011), and McCollum v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab. (9th Cir. 2011)

  • Cases involving the Fair Housing Act, including Intermountain Fair Hous. Council v. Boise Rescue Mission Ministries (9th Cir. 2011), and Tenafly Eruv Ass’n v. Borough of Tenafly (3d Cir. 2002)

  • Several cases regarding the delivery of religious messages and materials by public-school students, their families, and community groups, including A.M. v. Taconic Hills Central Sch. Dist. (2d Cir. 2013), Nurre v. Whitehead (9th Cir. 2009), Roark v. S. Iron R-1 Sch. Dist. (8th Cir. 2009), Busch v. Marple Newtown Sch. Dist. (3d Cir. 2009), and Doe v. S. Iron R-1 Sch. Dist. (8th Cir. 2007)

  • A.A. v. Needville Indep. Sch. Dist. (5th Cir. 2010), a Native American student’s challenge to the denial of an exemption from a public school’s grooming code

  • Equal Access Act and First Amendment challenges to the application of non- discrimination requirements to clubs in high schools and universities, including Christian Legal Soc’y v. Kane (9th Cir. 2009), and Truth v. Kent Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2008)

  • Challenges to the presentation of religious messages at sheriff’s department meetings, teacher trainings, and the Virginia Military Institute, in Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs Ass’n v. Clarke (7th Cir. 2009), Warnock v. Archer (8th Cir. 2004), and Mellen v. Bunting (4th Cir. 2003)

  • Branch Ministries v. Rossotti (D.C. Cir. 2000), a challenge to the revocation of a church’s tax-exempt status for engagement in partisan political activity

  • Several cases regarding the delivery of religious messages and materials by public-school teachers, including Johnson v. Poway Unified Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2011), Child Evangelism Fellowship v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist. (3d Cir. 2004), and Child Evangelism Fellowship v. Montgomery Cnty. Pub. Schs. (4th Cir. 2004)

Federal District (Trial) Courts

  • Scroggins v. H.W.M. (D.D.C. 2017), a copyright-infringement action

  • J.S. v. Strange (S.D. Ala. 2015), a federal constitutional challenge to a law forbidding same-sex couples to marry

  • S.M. v. Martinez (D.N.J. 2015), a free-speech challenge to a motor-vehicle regulation allowing the rejection of “offensive” personalized license plates

  • Several challenges to religious displays on government property, including S.H. v. City of King (M.D.N.C. 2014-2015), J.C. v. City of Everett (W.D. Wash. 2005), R.C. v. City of Frederick (D. Md. 2005), S.G. v. Moore (M.D. Ala. 2002), T.O. v. City of Ringgold (N.D. Ga. 2002), and L.B. v. City of Manhattan (D. Kan. 1999)

  • Challenges to governmental boards’ and councils’ recitation of sectarian prayers, including D.P. v. Town of Brentwood (D. Md. 2013), B.M. v. Sussex Cnty. (D. Del. 2012), and S.G. v. Town of Greece (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

  • Challenges to the presentation of prayers and other religious messages at graduation ceremonies, in classrooms, and at other public-school events, including K.S. v. Medina Valley Indep. Sch. Dist. (W.D. Tex. 2011-2012), Doe v. Round Rock Indep. Sch. Dist. (W.D. Tex. 2007-2008), J.T.D. v. Bd. of Educ. of Kanawha Cnty. (S.D.W. Va. 2002), and Does v. Sch. Bd. of Ouachita Parish (W.D. La. 2001)

  • Challenges to the provision of public funding to private religious organizations, including R.W. v. City of S. Bend (N.D. Ind. 2011), J.B.C. v. District of Columbia (D.D.C. 2008-2011), B.C. v. Leavitt (W.D. Wash. 2007), C.M. v. Bradford Cnty. (M.D. Pa. 2006), and Doe v. Norton (D.D.C. 2004- 2006)

  • R.S. v. Johnson Cnty. (E.D. Tenn. 2011-2012), a free-speech challenge to the rejection of posters in a public forum in a courthouse

  • K.W. v. Wagner (C.D. Cal. 2010-2012), a challenge to prayers at community- college graduations, scholarship ceremonies, and other official events

  • Challenges to the practice of holding public-school graduation ceremonies in churches, including Does v. Enfield Public Sch. (D. Conn. 2010-2012), Does v. Elmbrook Sch. Dist. (E.D. Wisc. 2010), D.M. v. Sch. Bd. of Brevard Cnty. (M.D. Fla. 2005)

  • T.S. v. Adams (D.S.C. 2009-2010), a challenge to a government-sponsored license plate with a religious message

  • A.P. v. Ky. Baptist Homes for Children (W.D. Ky. 2008), a Title VII and Establishment Clause challenge to the termination of a lesbian employee by a publicly funded religious institution

  • C.S. v. Nicholson (W.D. Wis. 2006-2007), a challenge to the federal government’s denial of a Wiccan emblem for veterans’ grave markers

  • Challenges to the use of anti-evolution disclaimers and the teaching of Intelligent Design or creationism in the public schools, in J.S. v. Cobb Cnty. Sch. Dist. (N.D. Ga. 2006-2007), K.H. v. Newman (E.D. Cal. 2006), and T.K. v. Dover Area Sch. Dist. (M.D. Pa. 2005)

  • Ams. United for Separation of Church & State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries (S.D. Iowa 2006), a challenge to a pervasively sectarian prison program

  • C.S. v. Chesterfield County Bd. of Sup’rs (E.D. Va. 2003), a challenge to the exclusion of minority clergy from the list of people eligible to offer prayers before official meetings

  • Nat’l Org. for Women v. St. Petersburg (M.D. Fla. 2000-2001), a challenge to the sale of a public hospital to a Catholic consortium

State Appellate Courts

  • N.K. v. G.W. (D.C. Ct. App. 2018), which involves an attorney-fee award under Necessaries Doctrine

  • T.P. v. G.P. (Ct. Spl. App. Md. 2018), an appeal of a child-support award

  • Cash v. LGE, Inc. (Ct. App. Ga. 2017), a products-liability case involving claims of negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, and restitution

  • Clark v. Va. Dep’t of State Police (Va. 2016), a case regarding Congress’s authority under the War Powers Clauses to subject states to litigation under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act

  • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Craig (Ct. App. Colo. 2015), a free-speech and free- exercise challenge to a state statute prohibiting sexual-orientation- discrimination against customers

  • Taxpayers for Pub. Educ. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. (Colo. 2015, Colo. Ct. App. 2014), and Colo. Cong. of Parents v. Owens (Colo. 2004), challenges to the provision of educational vouchers to parochial schools

  • J.M. v. Scott (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2014), a challenge to the provision of tax credits for parochial-school tuition

  • B.D. v. New Hampshire (N.H. 2014 2013), a challenge to a program providing scholarships for religious education

  • Va. Coll. Bldg. Auth. v. Lynn (Va. 2000), a challenge to bond financing State Trial Courts

  • A.C. v. P.C. (D.C. Super. Ct. 2018), an action involving breach-of-contract and state-tort claims

  • G.M. v. Enterprise RAC, Inc. (Mont. Cty. Cir. Ct. Md. 2018), a lawsuit involving malicious prosecution, defamation, and other state-law torts

  • J.M. v. Scott (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2014), a challenge to the provision of tax credits for parochial-school tuition

  • B.D. v. New Hampshire (N.H. Super. Ct. 2013), a challenge to a program providing scholarships for religious education

  • ACLU of N.J. v. Hendricks (N.J. Super. Ct. 2013), a challenge to the provision of construction grants to theological institutions

  • Taxpayers for Pub. Educ. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. (Colo. Dist. Ct. 2011), a challenge to the provision of educational vouchers to parochial schools

  • M.S. v. Browning (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2011), a challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment to repeal a state’s “Blaine Amendment”

  • Univ. of the Cumberlands v. Pennybacker (Ky. 2010), a challenge to the public funding of a building at a religious college

  • A.F. v. Browning (Fla. 2008 & Fla. Cir. Ct. 2008), a challenge to a ballot initiative repealing a state constitutional provision prohibiting the funding of parochial education

  • St. Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple (Mo. 2007), a challenge to tax-increment financing

  • Bush v. R.H. (Fla. 2006 & 2001, Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004 & 2000, Fla. Cir. Ct. 2002), challenges to the provision of educational vouchers to parochial schools

  • Va. Coll. Bldg. Auth. v. Lynn (Va. Cir. Ct. 2000), a challenge to bond financing

Publications and Speeches

Speaking Engagements

  • Panelist, Civil Rights Symposium 2018, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, (Apr. 12, 2018)
  • Panelist, Constitutional and Appellate Law in the Solo/Small Firm Setting, Maryland State Bar Association Solo & Small Firm Conference, Linthicum Heights, MD (Nov. 10, 2017)
  • Speaker, Withrow Chair in Government, Deep Springs College, Deep Springs Valley, CA (Sept. 20-23, 2017)
  • Panelist, “U.S. Supreme Court Roundup,” State and Local Legal Center, Washington, DC (July 13, 2017)
  • Panelist, “Prayer, Prisons, and Public Fora: Flashpoints at the Intersection of Religion and Municipal Practice,” International Municipal Lawyers’ Association Annual Seminar, Washington, DC (Apr. 23, 2017)
  • Speaker, Civil Rights Division, Continuing Legal Education Brown Bag Series (Oct. 15, 2015)
  • At a Crossroads: The Intersection Between Religious Liberties and Nondiscrimination Principles, Presented to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC (Mar. 22, 2013)
  • Panelist, Briefing on Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, American Constitution Society, Washington, DC (Apr. 7, 2010)
  • Panelist, Blazing a Career Path in Social Justice, Women’s Law & Public Policy Fellowship Program Seminar, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC (Dec. 7, 2009)
  • Panelist, Briefing on Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, American Constitution Society, Washington, DC (Nov. 6, 2008)
  • Panelist, The Constitutionality of Vouchers, Boston College Law School, Boston, MA (Jan. 23, 2002)
  • Panelist, The First Amendment and the Public Schools, First Amendment Center, Washington, DC (Nov. 3, 2001)
  • Lecturer, Advanced Constitutional Law, Washington College of Law, American University, Washington, DC (Oct. 25, 2001)
  • Lecturer, Washington Semester Program, American University, Washington, DC (Mar. 23, 2000)

Publications

  • Does the Americans with Disabilities Act Apply to Company Websites, MdAppBlog (May 14, 2018)
  • The #MeToo Movement and Arbitration Clauses,” MdAppBlog (April 16, 2018)
  • The Butcher, the Baker, the Candlestick Maker: When Nondiscrimination Principles Collide with Religious Freedom, Maryland Bar Journal (July/Aug. 2017)
  • Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: The Pitfalls and Pratfalls of Complying with the Establishment Clause, Municipal Lawyer (May/June 2017)
  • Hobby Lobby Symposium:  Your God Is Bigger Than My God, http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/hobby-lobby-symposium-your-god-is-bigger-than-my-god/ (June 2014)
  • Not Taking Yes for an Answer: Hobby Lobby, Conestoga Wood and the University of Notre Dame, http://www.jurist.org/hotline/2014/05/ayesha-khan-aca-contraception.php (May 2014)
  • At a Crossroads: The Intersection Between Religious Liberties and Nondiscrimination Principles, in Peaceful Coexistence? Reconciling Non-Discrimination Principles with Civil Liberties (U.S. Commission on Civil Rights ed., 2013)
  • Holy Headache: Is Bufferin’ an Adequate Prescription for the Rev. Phelps?, 2010 Cardozo L. Rev. De Novo 388 (2010) (with Michael Blank)

Media Appearances

Ms. Khan is often called upon by media outlets to provide commentary on legal issues relevant to her litigation practice and many of her cases have garnered extensive media coverage. She has appeared on numerous national and local news programs, including ABC World News Tonight, NBC Nightly News, MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Mathews, Fox TV’s O’Reilly Factor, and CNN’s Prime News and The World Today. She has also been interviewed on dozens of national and local radio programs, including NPR’s Morning Edition and All Things Considered. In addition, she has been quoted in The Washington Post, The New York Times, Int’l Herald Tribune, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Chicago Tribune, and dozens of regional newspapers.

Civic Involvement

  • Mentor, Mentor/Mentee Program, Bar Association of Montgomery County, Maryland (2016-Present)
  • Sunday School Teacher & Member, Washington Ethical Society, Washington, DC (2015-18)
  • Volunteer, National Center for Children & Families (2015-16)
  • Volunteer, Bradley Hills Elementary School (2009-15)
  • Founder & Co-Leader, Insight Family Community of Greater Washington (2009-12)
  • Volunteer, Oyster Bilingual Elementary School (2006-09)

Memberships and Affiliations

  • Maryland State Bar Association
  • Bar Association of Montgomery County, Maryland
  • Women’s Bar Association & Women’s Bar Association of Maryland
  • South Asian Bar Association-DC
  • National Asian Pacific American Bar Association & Asian Pacific Bar Association of Maryland

News, Events & Insights

Education

Berkeley Law, J.D., Order of the Coif

  • California Law Review, Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, Articles Editor

University of Michigan, A.B., Highest Distinction, James B. Angell Scholar

Previous Experience

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Deputy Chief
  • Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Legal Director
  • American Civil Liberties Union, National Prison Project, Staff Counsel
  • Covington & Burling, Associate

Clerkships

  • United States District Court for the Northern District of California, The Honorable Charles A. Legge, 1989-1990

Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Maryland
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
  • D.C. Superior Court
  • D.C. Court of Appeals
  • Maryland Court of Appeals
  • Maryland Court of Special Appeals

Recent News

Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use